Re: plpython3

> My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version
> over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be
> supporting a new version?
> 
> If there is, I am still all for it, but I am a python bigot.

Yeah, it's just my viewpoint that we don't want 2 python procedural
languages in core.  One should be in core, and one should go on
pgFoundry/PGAN.  Which ever one is "better" by some clear definition
should go in core.

As I said, I have no opinion about whether Pye's PLpython should replace
the existing because I'm in no position to judge.

--Josh Berkus