Re: plpython3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: plpython3
Дата
Msg-id 1263406128.20966.17.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plpython3  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: plpython3  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: plpython3  (James William Pye <lists@jwp.name>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 19:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-01-13 at 09:47 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I think it is important to remember that the current version of
> > PL/python is pretty weak compared to its counter parts (Specifically
> > PL/Perl).
>
> How so?

O.k. you may have just called me on an unintentional bluff. My knowledge
of plpython is dated. I just tested some of the things (like in/out) and
they appear to work at least on 8.4).

My argument would be now, what is the benefit of the James Pye version
over our version. James can you illustrate succinctly why we should be
supporting a new version?

If there is, I am still all for it, but I am a python bigot.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
>


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot standby documentation
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plpython3