Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
Дата
Msg-id 4B4D78B2.30600@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server  (Eduardo Piombino <drakorg@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
Список pgsql-performance
Eduardo Piombino wrote:
> Postgres version: 8.2.4, with all defaults, except DateStyle and TimeZone.

Ugh...there are several features in PostgreSQL 8.3 and later
specifically to address the sort of issue you're running into.  If you
want to get good write performance out of this system, you may need to
upgrade to at least that version.  It's impossible to resolve several of
the common problems in write operations being too intense using any 8.2
version.

> The final effect was that the server went non-responsive, for all
> matters, not even the TaskManager would come up when i hit
> CTRL-ALT-DEL, and of course, every client would suffer horrific (+20
> secs) for the simplest operations like SELECT NOW();

The thing that you have to realize is that altering a table is basically
making a new copy of that table, which is a really heavy amount of
writing.  It's quite easy for an I/O heavy operation like that to fill
up a lot of RAM with data to be written out, and when the database
periodically needs to force all that data out to disk the whole system
grinds to a halt when it happens.  There's no way I'm aware of to
throttle that writing down to a reasonable amount under Windows either,
to achieve your goal of just making the ALTER run using less resources.

Some reading:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server goes over
basic tuning of the database server.  If you haven't already increased
the checkpoint_segments parameters of your system, that's the first
thing to try--increase it *a lot* (32 or more, default is 3) because it
can really help with this problem.  A moderate increase to
shared_buffers is in order too; since you're on Windows, increasing it
to 256MB is a reasonable change.  The rest of the changes in there
aren't likely to help out with this specific problem.

http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/chkp-bgw-83.htm :
covers the most likely cause of the issue you're running into.
Unfortunately, most of the solutions you'll see there are things changed
in 8.3.

--
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Eduardo Piombino
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
Следующее
От: Eduardo Piombino
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server