Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
Дата
Msg-id 4A6F194C0200002500028E85@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string  (pgsql@mohawksoft.com)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> in fact the desired functionality is present [...] You just need to
> use the text() function to get the contents of the node, and an
> array subscript to pull it out of the result array.
I just took a quick look, and that didn't jump out at me from the
documentation.  Perhaps there should be an example or two of how to
get the equivalent functionality through the newer standard API, for
those looking to migrate?
Would it make sense to supply convenience SQL functions which map
some of the old API to the new?
-Kevin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
Следующее
От: pgsql@mohawksoft.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string