Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?

Tom Lane wrote:
> I thought he was asking for a solution to the problem of WALInsertLock
> contention.  In any case, we have "WAL bypass on a table by table basis"
> now, don't we?
>
>             
>   

If we do I'm ignorant of it ;-) How do we say "Never WAL this table"?

cheers

andrew