Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> This is a newer version of activitymail:
>>
>> < # $Id: activitymail,v 1.28 2004/03/11 17:22:04 theory Exp $
>> ---
>>> # $Id: activitymail 2776 2006-04-04 00:10:02Z theory $
>> I can revert back to the 2004/03/11 version is that would be preferrable
>> ... ?
>
> Fixing it is probably preferrable because who knows what other bugs have
> been fixed in it. But the URLs it's displaying are definitely broken.
as said on the other thread on -www, this should be fixed now.
Stefan