Re: PGSQL x iptables
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PGSQL x iptables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4A0232F2.4020608@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PGSQL x iptables ("Slansky Lukas" <Lukas.Slansky@upce.cz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PGSQL x iptables
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Slansky Lukas wrote: >> Craig Ringer wrote: >> >> After a long period of inactivity, perhaps? > > Is 15 seconds long period? I don't think so. No. If you see a connection that was working 15 and active seconds ago suddenly die, it's not due to time-based state table expiry. Do you see anything in `dmesg'? Have you used wireshark to trace activity on the interface and analyzed the dumps? You can often learn a lot about what's actually happening that way. > To John: I know it's related to iptables but this state seems to be only > on PG connections :-) Very odd. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: