>>> Richard Boulton <richard@lemurconsulting.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> No, it would have to be ASL 2, but that is pretty similar to BSD,
no?
>> (caveat: IANAL) i.e non-viral, free to use however you want, just
>> don't take credit for it. Everything I've read says the two are
>> completely compatible
>
> As I understand it, ASL 2 is incompatible with GPL 2, at least
according to
> the FSF. This would be a showstopper problem for me.
Where does GPL come into it? (I hadn't seen that mentioned before for
either product.)
-Kevin