Re: xpath processing brain dead
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: xpath processing brain dead |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 49ABD598.9030208@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: xpath processing brain dead (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> can you point me at any call in libxml2 which will evaluate an xpath >> expression in the context of a nodeset instead of a document? Quite >> apart from anything else, xpath requires there to be a (single) >> context node (see http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#context ). For a doc, >> we set that node to the document node, but what would it be for a >> node-set or a fragment? If we can't get over that hurdle we're >> screwed in pursuing your line of thought. > > Which may hint at the fact that running xpath on content fragments is > ill-defined to begin with?!? > Right. But that's no excuse for what we have been doing, which was demonstrably providing false results on good input. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: