Re: parallel restore

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>   
>> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.
>>     
>
> A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
> yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
> addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.
>
> More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
> anyone (certainly not by me).
>
>             
>   

I must have sent the wrong patch file.

I'll recheck for debugging stuff and send a new patch.

I can certainly hold off committing it.

cheers

andrew