Re: parallel restore

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.

A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.

More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
anyone (certainly not by me).
        regards, tom lane