Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Дата
Msg-id 495A6976.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> If you have a concrete suggestion (= patch) for the documentation,
I'm
> all ears.

I'm still working on section "Serializable Isolation versus True
Serializability", but here are all the changes I can see which precede
it.  Has the review of the SQL specs convinced everyone that this much
is appropriate?

It also seems like the "Data Consistency Checks at the Application
Level" section could use a little more detail.  Since referential
integrity checks are so well understood, and don't work reliably under
snapshot serialization without explicit locks, perhaps that could be
added?

-Kevin



Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jaime Casanova"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: about truncate
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: about truncate