Tom Lane wrote:
> "Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I understood your intention. But, I think that its function name is somewhat
>> confusing.
>>
>
> I agree. If the probe is meant to track only *some* WAL writes
> then it needs to be named something less generic than
> TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE.
>
>
How about change it to TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE_DIRTY similar to TRACE_POSTGRESQL_BUFFER_WRITE_DIRTY for
sharedbuffers?
-Robert