Re: DTrace probes patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DTrace probes patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25553.1229610862@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: DTrace probes patch ("Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DTrace probes patch
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Fujii Masao" <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@sun.com> wrote:
>> My understanding is that we only want to track the XLogWrite when advancing
>> to the next buffer page, and if there is unwritten data in the new buffer
>> page, that indicates no more empty WAL buffer pages available, but I may be
>> wrong. I did some tests by adjusting wal_buffers, and I could observe this
>> behavior, more calls to XLogWrite with smaller wal_buffers.
> I understood your intention. But, I think that its function name is somewhat
> confusing.
I agree. If the probe is meant to track only *some* WAL writes
then it needs to be named something less generic than
TRACE_POSTGRESQL_WAL_BUFFER_WRITE.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: