Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:36 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Robert Treat
>>> <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm... wasn't aware we discriminated against proprietary packagers. I'd think
>>>> companies like truviso and greenplum (and edb if they had different people in
>>>> charge) would all be interested in rolling out security updates asap,
>>> What's that supposed to mean?
>> Exactly what you write below.
>
> I must be suffering brain failure because I read it as saying Truvisio
> and GreenPlum would be interested in rolling out security updates
> asap, and EDB would with different people in charge, meaning that we
> aren't with the current management - which is certainly not true.
FWIW, I read it as if EDB *didn't already have people there for other
reasons*, they'd also be interested in being on packagers.
But reading it after what you wrote I realise it can probably be read
either way :-)
//Magnus