Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Дата
Msg-id 4936.1224774846@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>> Well, aside from the gruntwork needed to convert all the core code that
>> still uses the old APIs, there's the prospect of breaking extension
>> modules that still use the old APIs.  It's kind of annoying to have two
>> copies of that code, but less annoying than removing it would be ...

> What's about convert null array to boolean and call heap_form_tuple?

Yeah, that's a thought.  We'd want to be sure we'd converted any call
sites that are performance-critical, but surely the vast majority are
not.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zdenek Kotala
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?