Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От James B. Byrne
Тема Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Дата
Msg-id 49354.216.185.71.25.1291760145.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux  (Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, December 7, 2010 16:56, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
> No those lib differences are both still 32bit. You would have a
> problem if one was 64bit. So you should be fine there.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

Ok.  How do I get postgresql to cough up more processing detail on
startup?  The message that I presently get makes no sense at all to
me.


--
***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
James B. Byrne                mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux