Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ray Stell
Тема Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux
Дата
Msg-id 20101208010321.GA6699@cns.vt.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux  ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>)
Ответы Re: PG84 and SSL on CentOS-5.5 was PG84 and SELinux  ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:15:45PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Tue, December 7, 2010 16:56, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > No those lib differences are both still 32bit. You would have a
> > problem if one was 64bit. So you should be fine there.
> >
> > Joshua D. Drake
> >
>
> Ok.  How do I get postgresql to cough up more processing detail on
> startup?  The message that I presently get makes no sense at all to
> me.

do we know that pg was compiled with ssl?  maybe a bonehead question,
but low hanging fruit is my specialty.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jonathan Tripathy
Дата:
Сообщение: Uncommitted Data
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Uncommitted Data