Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Дата
Msg-id 4934020F.3060901@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Ответы Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  ("Greg Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> it depends on how you look at it, I suppose. If you look at ":xy" as "x"
>> being the 10s position and "y" being the 1s position, it makes no sense.
>>     
>
> Suffice it to say, I don't look at it that way :-). I'd wager most
> people wouldn't either, but I have no data to back that up of course.
>
>
>   

Isn't the point that ambiguity is undesirable, as is inconsistency? So 
counts of people who see this one way or the other should be irrelevant.

Alvaro noted the use in the wild of formats like "%d:%d:%d" for times. 
IMNSHO we should not cater to such bad code.

cheers

andrew

cheers


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new