Re: [9.3] Automatically updatable views vs writable foreign tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [9.3] Automatically updatable views vs writable foreign tables
Дата
Msg-id 4903.1371082280@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [9.3] Automatically updatable views vs writable foreign tables  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [9.3] Automatically updatable views vs writable foreign tables  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> The more I read the spec, the less sense it seems to make, and each
> time I read it, I seem to reach a different conclusion.

> On my latest reading, I've almost convinced myself that "updatable" is
> meant to imply support for all 3 operations (INSERT, UPDATE and
> DELETE), at least in the absence of transient tables. The descriptions
> of all 3 seem to require the table to be updatable.

Still, they do admit the possibility of insertable_into being different
from is_updatable.  So I'm pretty happy with what we've got, at least
on the relation level.  Columns seem a bit more debatable; though I
continue to think that an is_updatable column in a not-is_updatable
table isn't contemplated by the spec.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum, Freeze and Analyze: the big picture
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallell Optimizer