Re: Block level concurrency during recovery

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 19:21 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> You have other issues with those still, namely that 
>> table locks are not yet taken appropriately, so I'm not sure if this is 
>> worth worrying about until that's done.
> 
> Please explain. If you know of a correctness issue, please say.

Things like DROP TABLE need to take an AccessExclusiveLock, and you 
don't have that yet, no?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com