Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions

* On 2018-06-12 16:35, Geoff Winkless wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>> UNBOUNDED would be terrible. It does not mean the same thing as UNBOUND.
> 
> Indeed. I agree.
> 
>> Perhaps something like NO CHECK would meet the case, i.e. we're not
>> checking the link at function creation time.
> 
> I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words
> would make the parser change more complex.

DEFERRED?

-- 
Christian