Re: Error XX000 After pg11 upgrade

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gavin Flower
Тема Re: Error XX000 After pg11 upgrade
Дата
Msg-id 48a48d13-8f8e-19be-371f-ef129ff972dd@archidevsys.co.nz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Error XX000 After pg11 upgrade  (Simon Windsor <simon.windsor@cornfield.me.uk>)
Список pgsql-general
On 16/08/2019 04:35, Simon Windsor wrote:
> Hi
>
> The Full system used to in an Oracle DB and was ported to Postgres 9.5 
> about 2+ years ago, and partitioned using inheritance tables.
>
> Since then pg_upgrade has been used to upgrade to pg10 (with apt 
> upgrade to take to 10.5 occasionally).
>
> Last week, pg_upgrade was againn used to upgrade to pg11.4.
>
> Since then, large bulk inserts of configuration changes are failing 
> with this Error, but adhoc and small changes are working ok.
>
> The actual error is reported by a Java process
>
> Caused by: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: cache lookup 
> failed for type 22079
>   Where: SQL statement "insert into configObjectsFull_2019 values 
> (new.*)"
> PL/pgSQL function configobjectsfull_insert_trigger() line 28 at SQL 
> statement
>     at 
> org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.receiveErrorResponse(QueryExecutorImpl.java:2310)
>     at
>
> The DB Tableand Trigger are attached.
>
> As you can see, the id and timestamp are set on insert, and are used 
> to determine the partition used.
>
> This issue started after the upgrade to pg11, pg10 and pg9 had no 
> problems.
>
> Any ideas would be appreciated.


[...]

Probably will make no difference, but have you considered testing using 
pg 11.5?  It would at least rule out a lot of Red Herrings!


Cheers,
Gavin





В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Igor Neyman
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Variable constants ?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Error XX000 After pg11 upgrade