Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... simplified syntax?
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... simplified syntax? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 48F0F94E.6030204@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... simplified syntax? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WITH RECURSIVE ... simplified syntax?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> Would it be a worth it for us to implement a non-standard simple syntax >> sugar on top of WITH RECURSIVE? Or, at least, something like >> CONNECT_BY()? > > The Oracle syntax only *looks* simple. When you start to study it > you realize that it's a horrid, messy kluge. Yeah. I was actually thinking more of something like: <table_identifier> RECURSIVE JOIN ON <column_expression> <operator> <column_expression> ... which would be a pretty good simplest-case syntax. When I mentioned connect_by() I was referring to Joe's function, not Oracle's syntax, which I think is awful. --Josh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: