Re: parallel pg_restore

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: parallel pg_restore
Дата
Msg-id 48D7EC8F.1000106@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: parallel pg_restore  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: parallel pg_restore
Re: parallel pg_restore
Список pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I will not argue vehemently here but I will say that "jobs" doesn't
>> seem correct. The term "workers" seems more appropriate.
>>     
>
> Agreed, but most utilities have "j" free but not w, p, t or other
> letters that might be synonyms.
>
> j is at least used for exactly this purpose in other tools.
>
>   

There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly 
profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite.

j and m happen to be two of those that are available.

I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it should be 
called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads.

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
Следующее
От: Ron Mayer
Дата:
Сообщение: Interval literal rounding bug(?) and patch.