Re: parallel pg_restore

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> j and m happen to be two of those that are available.
> 
> I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it should be 
> called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads.

Perhaps we can use -j for jobs and -m for memory, so we can set memory
available across all threads with a single total value.

I can live with jobs or multi-threads also, whichever we decide. Neither
one is confusing to explain.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support