Top N within groups?
| От | Klint Gore |
|---|---|
| Тема | Top N within groups? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4876D26C.1070202@une.edu.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | {SOLVED?] Re: functional index not used, looping simpler query just faster (Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Top N within groups?
Re: Top N within groups? how to found a variable is in a aggregation or not? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
[was {SOLVED?] Re: [GENERAL] functional index not used, looping simpler
query just faster]
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> I'm still curious to know if this could be done
> efficiently with just one query.
>
[thinking out loud]
Can someone familiar with the source for DISTINCT ON comment on how hard
it would be to add another parameter to return more than one row?
e.g.
To do TOP 1 within an unknown number of groups
select distinct on (groupid) groupid, identifier, count(*)
from somequery
group by groupid, identifier
order by 1,3 desc,2;
I'm thinking that, for the top 3 within each group, something like
select distinct on (groupid) FOR 3 groupid, identifier, count(*)
from somequery
group by groupid, identifier
order by 1,3 desc,2;
For Ivan's case, groupid = brand, identifer = item. The where clause
applies the date limits.
klint.
--
Klint Gore
Database Manager
Sheep CRC
A.G.B.U.
University of New England
Armidale NSW 2350
Ph: 02 6773 3789
Fax: 02 6773 3266
EMail: kgore4@une.edu.au
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: