Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> Well, one thing I think we want to do by having non-committer reviewers, is
>> to not involve a committer at all if the patch is going to be sent back.
>> So one thing I was thinking of is:
>
>> 1) change status to "ready for committer"
>> 2) post message to -hackers detailing the review and calling for a
>> committer to check the patch
>> 3) a committer picks it up
>
> Well, the key point there is just the sign-off in the review message.
On the wiki, or on -hackers?
--Josh