Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Well, one thing I think we want to do by having non-committer reviewers, is
> to not involve a committer at all if the patch is going to be sent back.
> So one thing I was thinking of is:
> 1) change status to "ready for committer"
> 2) post message to -hackers detailing the review and calling for a
> committer to check the patch
> 3) a committer picks it up
Well, the key point there is just the sign-off in the review message.
regards, tom lane