Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)
Дата
Msg-id 4876.1292616514@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: FOREACH-IN-ARRAY (probably for 9.2?)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> plpgsql's parser is rickety enough that I don't have a lot of confidence
>> in its ability to do things that way.

> Bummer.  Rickety is not good.

Agreed, but it's not entirely the parser's fault: the language
definition is pretty d*mn bogus to start with.  Read the comments for
the for_variable production, and ask yourself whether you really want
to inject even more difficult-to-disambiguate cases right there.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST