Tom Dunstan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> The typical way to solve this is to have the tracker send an automatic
>> > notification email to a list saying "Hey, there's a new ticket at ,
>> > come and check it out".
>>
>> Unfortunately that is the typical way to "solve" this. And it's awful.
>> It's like the ubiquitous cryptic phone call in movies saying "can't talk
>> right now but there's something you should know. Meet me under the bridge"
>
> Yeah, it sucks, because people won't bother looking. It fails Tom's
> "sniff" test. (Although I can attest to having submitted a previously
> discussed patch to -patches and received *zero* feedback, even
> something like "we're too busy getting 8.2 out, come back later").
>
> What's wrong with a patch submitter submitting a patch to a tracker,
> but then emailing the list for actual discussion? "Hi there, I just
> upload patch #12345 which implements TODO item n, can people please
> have a look? I've done x, y and z, not sure about p and q". Then
> discussion still happens on-list which is a much better discussion
> medium, and the patch has a proper status page which the author can
> keep up to date with the latest version etc etc.
well what about having the tracker being subscribed to the list and let
it create a bug/patch/ticket id automatically for new mails - that way
all stuff is automatically tracked ? - That way it can be categorized in
the course of the following discussion but no history gets lost.
Stefan