Re: Script binaries renaming

Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
> Question is also how many users really use these commands. For example 
> vacuumdb is not too important now when we have autovacuum.

This is not true. Plenty of apps will quite reasonably choose to follow 
large batch updates by a single vacuumdb rather than using autovacuum.

Incidentally, I am less opposed than some to some sensible renaming 
here, eventually. Perhaps we could take the opportunity to fix the 
naming of initdb, which confuses the heck out of many people.

cheers

andrew