Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
| От | Robert Lor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 47C80F89.5000409@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard
Re: DTrace probe patch for OS X Leopard |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > I agree with Peter. There are a whole lot of include files that are > needed by way more than 3 .c files, and yet are not folded into > postgres.h. c.h is right out. > My concern is that when we start adding more probes (not just the backend), we will have to add the following 5 lines in .c files that use the Dtrace macros. This seems intrusive and messy to me instead of in a centralized place like c.h. What are the disadvantages for keeping the way it is now? #ifdef ENABLE_DTRACE #include "utils/probes.h" #else #include "utils/probes_null.h" #endif Regards, -Robert
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: