Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
| От | Andrew Chernow |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4783FB03.80500@esilo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: >> That said, we have been a little dismayed in the lack of comment. > > Personally, I'm ignoring this thread, as well as the one on > partitioning, because I'm up to my arse in 8.3-release alligators. > I'm going to try hard not to think about any 8.4 development issues > until 8.3 is actually out the door and we branch for 8.4 development. > > I can't say how many other people are equally pressed for time ... > but seeing the minimal attention that seems to be getting paid to > open 8.3 issues, it doesn't look to me like the community as a whole > has a lot of spare cycles right now. > > regards, tom lane > > Thanks for the heads up. We had a feeling the 8.3 crunch was a factor. We don't want to slow that down because we wereare waiting for 8.3 to perform yet another mysql to postgresql migration :) andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: