Re: executor relation handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: executor relation handling
Дата
Msg-id 47712b16-2b78-d66c-81b8-8afadf6bcd70@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: executor relation handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018/10/09 0:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Keeping that comparison in mind, I'm inclined to think that 0001
>> is the best thing to do for now.  The incremental win from 0002
>> is not big enough to justify the API break it creates, while your
>> 0005 is not really attacking the problem the right way.
> 
> I've pushed 0001 now.  I believe that closes out all the patches
> discussed in this thread, so I've marked the CF entry committed.
> Thanks for all the hard work!

Thanks a lot for reviewing and committing.

Regards,
Amit




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: merge semi join cost calculation error
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: executor relation handling