Re: executor relation handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: executor relation handling
Дата
Msg-id 5509d3e8-64e9-d584-c841-69c0d6b3c343@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: executor relation handling  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: executor relation handling  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Re: executor relation handling  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018/09/28 17:48, David Rowley wrote:
> On 28 September 2018 at 20:28, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2018/09/28 17:21, David Rowley wrote:
>>> I think we maybe should switch the word "assert" for "verifies". The
>>> Assert is just checking we didn't get a NoLock and I don't think
>>> you're using "assert" meaning the Assert() marco, so likely should be
>>> changed to avoid confusion.
>>
>> Okay, I've revised the text in the attached updated patch.
> 
> Meh, I just noticed that the WARNING text claims "InitPlan" is the
> function name. I think it's best to get rid of that. It's pretty much
> redundant anyway if you do: \set VERBOSITY verbose

Oops, good catch that one.  Removed "InitPlan: " from the message in the
attached.

Thanks,
Amit

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: executor relation handling
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)