Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 476382.1741208421@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: making EXPLAIN extensible (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm quite confused by the #include additions in auto_explain.c and >> file_fdw.c, and I strongly object to the ones in explain_state.h. >> Surely those are unnecessary? > They are necessary but they should have been part of 0001. Ah. I was mistakenly assuming that 0001 would compile on its own ;-) > Because > 0001 moves the definition of ExplainState to explain_state.h, files > that need to access to the members of that structure now need to > include that header file. As for the includes in explain_state.h, it > needs definitions for DefElem, ParseState, and PlannedStmt. Got it. So does that mean we can remove any #include's from explain.h after moving the struct definition? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: