On September 18, 2017 4:08:21 AM PDT, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>wrote:
>>>It seems to me that you are looking more for a connection parameter
>>>here.
>>
>> I'm not seeing a meaningful distinction here? Env vars and connection
>parameters are handled using the same framework in libpq. And using
>the env var in the test would be better, because you'd only set one
>value - hard to do within our non TAP tests (i.e. in an existing psql,
>started by pg regress) otherwise.
>
>Or both? I don't really understand why an environment variable is
>better than a connection string. For the TAP tests, you could just set
>the base of the connection string once and you are done as well. See
>the SSL tests for example.
Did you read what I wrote?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers