Paul Lambert wrote:
>
> It's marked not null as a result of being part of the primary key for
> that table which I can't really get around.
>
> I can get away with not having the foreign key though, so I'll have to
> go down that path.
>
> Cheers,
> P.
>
Ignore this whole thread actually.
I need to rethink some of my design.
--
Paul Lambert
Database Administrator
AutoLedgers