Re: Quick question re foreign keys.

Paul Lambert wrote:
> 
> It's marked not null as a result of being part of the primary key for 
> that table which I can't really get around.
> 
> I can get away with not having the foreign key though, so I'll have to 
> go down that path.
> 
> Cheers,
> P.
> 

Ignore this whole thread actually.

I need to rethink some of my design.

-- 
Paul Lambert
Database Administrator
AutoLedgers