Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 471E730F.5050108@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2 >> months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea? It might be hard to pull >> off, but we won't know until we try. >> > > It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it > doesn't work. > > Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking > only a month of work between commit-fests. I like a two-month cycle > partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always > know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like > that, is commit-fest time. > > > +1 on both counts. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: