Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 470BE812.7020104@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new >>>> stuff after it has been declared? >>> We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes. >> Why? When people were complaining about not being able to use TSearch >> because their ISPs wouldn't install contrib modules we couldn't >> understand why they would think that way. If we are going to be less >> stringent about /contrib, maybe they were right to cautious. > > The idea is /contrib isn't installed by default and it isn't tied into > the core code, and can be tested easier because it is stand-alone. We > can rethink that logic but that has been the guide in the past. I think you just outlined a whole lot of arguments for pgfoundry, and not for contrib. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: