Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>   
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>     
>>> I don't see how timing has anything to do with this.  You could have
>>> added it between beta1 and beta2 after sufficient hackers discussion. 
>>>       
>> Uh, it *was* after beta1.
>>     
>
> Oh, so it didn't hold up beta1 --- that's good.
>
>   

No it's not.

Can somebody please explain to me what beta means if you can commit new 
stuff after it has been declared?

cheers

andrew