hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:34:32PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
>> That seems a confusing set of values. Perhaps "off", "pl", and "all"
>> would be clearer?
>> I'm curious if you've measured the performance overhead of enabling this
>> functionality.
>
> i'm quite worried about "all" setting.
> all operators are functions as well, so tracking literally all function
> calls might be too heavy.
>
"all" would additionally count only C and SQL functions, builtins (language
"internal") are skipped. Maybe there should be option to count these as well,
perhaps with a really scare name (track_functions = all_plus_internal).
> on the other hand i would like to be able to track some non-pl functions
> like RI%.
>
These are builtin.
Regards,
Martin