Re: Contrib modules documentation online
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Contrib modules documentation online |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46D5F8BF.30703@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Contrib modules documentation online (Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation. However, I think >> it might make sense to put "Contrib Modules" as a section under either >> "Reference" or "Appendices". Also, I don't think it's necessary to make >> each command option a separate subchapter, but I can see how that would be >> hard to avoid in an automated system. >> > > It's not an automated system, README files have different structures so it's > all manual work. That's why I asked how you think it should be organized. > Anyone else thinks we should put it in Reference or Appendixes? > I would far rather have a new top level heading. Something like "Standard Modules and Tools". (Please avoid the use of the word "contrib"). If not, than as a sub-chapter of "References". I don't think it belongs in the Appendixes. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: