Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
| От | Tony Caduto |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46D30013.4030805@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished ("Stephen Ince" <since@opendemand.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Stephen Ince wrote: > Postgres can't be embedded or serverless. Firebird has the embedded > feature. Most of the databases have this capability (hsqldb, > derby,oracle,mysql, firebird, and db2). Derby and hsqldb are the only > free embedded databases for commercial use. > A lot of Firebird users have been saying this as well, but the comparison if more for Enterprise use. Plus if you need a embedded database wouldn't it be better to use one built specifically for that purpose? i.e. SQLite for example. Good call on the name limit, I remember running into that when porting something from MS SQL server to Firebird about 4 years ago. I will have to check and see if this still applies to version 2.0 Later, Tony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: