Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
От | Stephen Ince |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0fc101c7e8c3$a7044490$8100a8c0@desktop2 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Список | pgsql-general |
Postgres can't be embedded or serverless. Firebird has the embedded feature. Most of the databases have this capability (hsqldb, derby,oracle,mysql, firebird, and db2). Derby and hsqldb are the only free embedded databases for commercial use. I recently ported a schema from postgres to firebird and found name size limitations. Firebird has a limitation on the size of it's column names, table names, constraint names and index names. I think the size limitation on firebird is 31 characters. Postgres doesn't have this limitation. Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: