Bill Moran wrote:
> I guess I just feel that "broken" is a bit of a harsh term. If
> your expectations are for full-blown connection management from
> pconnect(), then you will be disappointed. If you take it for
> what it is: persistent connections, then those limitations would
> be expected.
It's broken because persistent connections get randomly garbage
collected where they should not. So broken in the sense of bugged.
Expect connections to die for no reason, especially under load.
--
Best regards,
Hannes Dorbath