Re: Writing most code in Stored Procedures
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Writing most code in Stored Procedures |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 46C71E63.4050903@cox.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Writing most code in Stored Procedures ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Writing most code in Stored Procedures
Re: Writing most code in Stored Procedures |
| Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/18/07 11:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Josh Tolley wrote: >> On 8/18/07, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote: >>> Interesting. Does PG have to initiate the Perl interpreter every >>> time you call a Perl-written SP? >> IIRC PostgreSQL should only load the perl interpreter once per session. > > Right. I'd have been stunned if you did it any other way. So why is Perl-SP-INSERT so much slower than Perl-SQL-INSERT? (I can imagine that the SP code path would be longer, but since IO is the slowest part of the system, I'm surprised that it's *that* much slower.) - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGxx5jS9HxQb37XmcRAn1vAKCEWTovgcj/w/uFVK0nankGdbOFuACg6HSq dUnMN0dPsdQ8NKSDW0EahcU= =P8gN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: