> > People should really use DBD::Pg (good that it stays on CPAN).
>
> Why do you say that?
>
> Pg's interface seems a bit closer to libpg's interface than DBD::Pg.
> I would think that would be an advantage.
Well libpq is very nonstandard same as interfaces/perl5. Since I like
somewhat portable code, I would allways suggest people use the more standard
interfaces, like DBD::Pg ODBC ECPG.
Andreas