Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
Thanks a lot.
Hiroshi Inoue
Jim Nasby wrote:
> On May 6, 2007, at 4:38 PM, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>>>> Under what license is this file distributed ?
>>>> Could you please reply to my question ?
>>>
>>> It's from the PostgreSQL source tree, so whatever license that has.
>>
>> So what's it ?
>> Could you please take account of developers in the psqlodbc project
>> a little more ?
>
> decibel@platter.1[10:59]~/pgsql/HEAD:61%cat COPYRIGHT
> PostgreSQL Database Management System
> (formerly known as Postgres, then as Postgres95)
>
> Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2007, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>
> Portions Copyright (c) 1994, The Regents of the University of California
>
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written agreement
> is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this
> paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies.
>
> IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR
> DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING
> LOST PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE AND ITS
> DOCUMENTATION, EVEN IF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
> POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>
> THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES,
> INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
> AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED HEREUNDER IS
> ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HAS NO OBLIGATIONS TO
> PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.
> decibel@platter.1[10:59]~/pgsql/HEAD:62%
>
> --
> Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)